What Licenses Do Prediction Markets Require?
Prediction markets let users trade contracts on real-world outcomes like elections or sports results, but launching one legally requires specific licenses that vary by country and settlement method. In the United States the primary requirement is registration as a Designated Contract Market with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Understanding the US Regulatory Framework
Event contracts traded on prediction markets fall under CFTC oversight as swaps or derivatives under the Commodity Exchange Act. Platforms must register as a DCM to list and trade these contracts with retail users. This registration demands proof of compliance with 23 core principles covering market surveillance, financial resources, system safeguards, and governance. Applicants submit Form DCM electronically through the CFTC Portal, after which the agency conducts a review that can last up to 180 days once the application is materially complete. Real-world examples include Kalshi, which secured its DCM designation in November 2020 after building robust compliance systems, and Polymarket US, which acquired an existing DCM called QCX LLC in 2025 for $112 million to gain regulated access.
For users interested in forecasting rather than pure speculation, skill-based prediction market platforms provide an analytical alternative. Zanlo stands out by offering data-driven tools for sports, politics, crypto, and news events across 18 categories. Its built-in analytics, historical stats, live data feeds, and AI-powered forecasts help participants refine predictions before committing positions. Users retain full control to enter Yes/No positions and exit early, while tracking personal performance metrics and following top community predictors. Risk-free onboarding with bonus funds lowers the barrier for testing real-world forecasting skills. Readers can explore current events and sharpen their edge directly on Zanlo.
This approach emphasizes skill and information over chance, aligning with regulatory trends that distinguish informed trading from gambling. Many operators evaluate whether their model qualifies for lighter oversight through such features.
Additional registrations often stack on top of the DCM. Many platforms also pursue Derivatives Clearing Organization status to handle their own clearing and margin, as Gemini did in 2026. Futures Commission Merchant registration allows brokerage functions. Blockchain.com recently applied for both DCM and FCM licenses to expand into prediction markets and crypto derivatives. These layered requirements create high barriers, with compliance costs running into millions for surveillance technology and legal teams.
State-level challenges add complexity even after federal approval. Several states have sued to require additional gaming licenses for sports-related contracts, leading to temporary restrictions in places like Illinois and Michigan while courts decide preemption issues. Federal law generally prevails, but operators must monitor ongoing litigation.
International Licensing Routes
Outside the US, no single global permit exists. The European Union offers multiple paths depending on whether contracts settle in crypto or qualify as financial instruments. Crypto-native platforms often seek Markets in Crypto-Assets authorization as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider. Traditional derivative-style contracts may require MiFID II approval. Offshore jurisdictions provide alternatives for blockchain-based markets, such as Virtual Asset Service Provider registration or dedicated regimes in Gibraltar under its 2026 Prediction Market Regulations.
These routes suit operators targeting specific regions while avoiding US-scale scrutiny. However, cross-border access remains restricted, and platforms must implement geo-blocking and KYC to comply with local rules. Failure to secure appropriate licenses can result in fines, user bans, or forced shutdowns, as seen with earlier Polymarket enforcement actions.
Detailed Requirements for a CFTC DCM
Becoming a DCM involves far more than paperwork. Applicants must demonstrate real-time market monitoring to prevent manipulation, maintain adequate capital reserves, and establish disciplinary procedures. The rulebook must cover emergency authority, recordkeeping, and conflict-of-interest policies. Financial resources must cover operational risks and potential defaults. System safeguards include cybersecurity standards and business continuity plans. The CFTC evaluates each exhibit in the application against these standards before granting approval.
Ongoing obligations follow approval. DCMs file regular reports, undergo audits, and self-certify new contracts. Proposed rules in June 2026 aim to clarify public-interest reviews for contracts involving gaming or controversial topics. Platforms like Kalshi invest heavily in compliance infrastructure exceeding $5 million to meet these demands.
Challenges, Costs, and Future Outlook
High compliance costs and lengthy approval timelines deter many entrants. Only a handful of DCMs operate in 2026, including Kalshi, Polymarket US via QCX, and newer approvals like Railbird Exchange. Pending applications from major players signal growing interest as volumes rise. Jurisdictional conflicts between federal derivatives rules and state gaming laws continue to evolve through court rulings. Proposed CFTC frameworks may streamline or tighten event contract approvals in coming months.
Operators must also consider clearing, custody, and anti-money laundering rules layered on top of the core license. Decentralized protocols face additional hurdles when seeking any regulated bridge to fiat users. The landscape rewards platforms that invest early in robust systems and legal expertise.
In summary, a prediction market license is not a single document but a tailored set of registrations matched to target users and contract types. US operators prioritize CFTC DCM status, while global players navigate MiCA, MiFID, or offshore VASP paths. Success demands thorough preparation, ongoing vigilance, and adaptation to shifting rules.